Sudan : Sudan still not agreed to bigger UN force: official
on 2011/1/8 10:39:39
Sudan

20110107
reuters

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - Sudan still has not agreed to a U.N. plan to increase its peacekeeping force there by 20 percent, as the African nation heads into a referendum that could split it in two, the U.N. peacekeeping chief said on Thursday.

Sudan's U.N. ambassador said there was no need for the proposed addition of 2,000 troops to the 10,000-strong force, which monitors compliance with a 2005 deal that ended a civil war between north and south Sudan.

The oil-producing south is due to vote in a referendum starting on Sunday on whether to secede. Voters are widely expected to back secession.

The proposal to boost the U.N. force, known as UNMIS, was first mentioned last November by U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon at a time when there were widespread fears that the plebiscite could spark a new civil war.

The plan was a response to a request from the president of south Sudan, Salva Kiir, who asked the U.N. Security Council to approve a U.N.-monitored buffer zone along the semi-autonomous south's border with the north.

"So far we haven't got approval from Khartoum on this issue," U.N. peacekeeping head Alain Le Roy told reporters on Thursday after briefing the Council on Sudan.

"We cannot make a formal request (to the Security Council) until we have the agreement of the parties, and we don't have it yet."

Le Roy admitted that the increase had become less urgent because of rising hopes the referendum would be peaceful, but he said his department was still seeking it.

"We are very confident the referendum will be held peacefully and on time," Le Roy said. "We are much more optimistic today than we were three months ago."

Sudanese Ambassador Daffa-Alla Elhag Ali Osman told reporters the idea of increasing UNMIS "has not been yet discussed because there is no need for that." Le Roy did not raise the matter at a meeting with Osman on Wednesday, Osman said.

If Sudan were to split, the future of UNMIS would be unclear. U.N. officials said they expected the south, and possibly also the north, to request some kind of continued U.N. presence.

Previous article - Next article Printer Friendly Page Send this Story to a Friend Create a PDF from the article


Other articles
2023/7/22 16:36:35 - Uncertainty looms as negotiations on the US-Kenya trade agreement proceeds without a timetable
2023/7/22 14:48:23 - 40 More Countries Want to Join BRICS, Says South Africa
2023/7/18 14:25:04 - South Africa’s Putin problem just got a lot more messy
2023/7/18 14:17:58 - Too Much Noise Over Russia’s Influence In Africa – OpEd
2023/7/18 12:15:08 - Lagos now most expensive state in Nigeria
2023/7/18 11:43:40 - Nigeria Customs Intercepts Arms, Ammunition From US
2023/7/17 17:07:56 - Minister Eli Cohen: Nairobi visit has regional and strategic importance
2023/7/17 17:01:56 - Ruto Outlines Roadmap for Africa to Rival First World Countries
2023/7/17 16:47:30 - African heads of state arrive in Kenya for key meeting
2023/7/12 16:51:54 - Kenya, Iran sign five MoUs as Ruto rolls out red carpet for Raisi
2023/7/12 16:46:35 - Ambassador-at-Large for Global Women’s Issues Gupta Travels to Kenya and Rwanda
2023/7/2 15:57:52 - We Will Protect Water Catchments
2023/7/2 15:53:49 - Kenya records slight improvement in global peace ranking
2023/7/2 14:33:37 - South Sudan, South Africa forge joint efforts for peace in Sudan
2023/7/2 13:08:02 - Tinubu Ready To Assume Leadership Role In Africa
2023/7/2 11:50:34 - CDP ranks Nigeria, others low in zero-emission race
2023/6/19 16:30:00 - South Africa's Ramaphosa tells Putin Ukraine war must end
2023/6/17 16:30:20 - World Bank approves Sh45bn for Kenya Urban Programme
2023/6/17 16:25:47 - Sudan's military govt rejects Kenyan President Ruto as chief peace negotiatorThe Sudanese military government of Abdel Fattah al-Burhan has rejected Kenyan President William Ruto's leadership of the "Troika on Sudan."
2023/6/17 16:21:15 - Kenya Sells Record 2.2m Tonnes of Carbon Credits to Saudi Firms

The comments are owned by the author. We aren't responsible for their content.