South Africa : S.Africa's Zuma wants to review constitutional court's power
on 2012/2/14 13:21:32
South Africa

20120214
AFP
South African President Jacob Zuma, who has repeatedly butted heads with the judiciary, said in an interview published Monday he wants to review the powers of the country's highest court.


"We don't want to review the Constitutional Court, we want to review its powers," Zuma told The Star newspaper.

"It is after experience that some of the decisions are not decisions that every other judge in the Constitutional Court agrees with," he added.

Zuma has already locked horns with the Constitutional Court, which ruled last year the president could not unilaterally extend the term of then-chief justice Sandile Ngcobo.

Zuma responded by instead appointing Mogoeng Mogoeng, a judge criticised by opposition and activist groups as anti-gay, lenient on rapists and close to Zuma.

Created in 2004, the 11-judge court has the final say on constitutional matters.

"There are dissenting judgements which we read. You will find that the dissenting one has more logic than the one that enjoyed the majority. What do you do in that case? That's what has made the issue to become the issue of concern," Zuma said.

He said judges are "influenced by what's happening and influenced by you guys (the media)."

But he also said it was part of the democratic process for the courts to challenge his decisions.

The interview comes as Zuma's administration heads Wednesday to the Supreme Court of Appeal for arguments on whether prosecutors should have dropped corruption charges against him in 2009, a move that cleared his path to the presidency but has clouded his time in office.

South Africa's main opposition party, the Democratic Alliance, brought the case, questioning the constitutionality of the decision to drop charges that Zuma received bribes as part of a multi-billion-dollar arms deal.

The same court last year overturned Zuma's appointment of a national director of public prosecutions who was seen as an ally of the president but faced questions over his qualifications.

The Supreme Court of Appeal is the highest court for criminal matters.

Previous article - Next article Printer Friendly Page Send this Story to a Friend Create a PDF from the article


Other articles
2023/7/22 16:36:35 - Uncertainty looms as negotiations on the US-Kenya trade agreement proceeds without a timetable
2023/7/22 14:48:23 - 40 More Countries Want to Join BRICS, Says South Africa
2023/7/18 14:25:04 - South Africa’s Putin problem just got a lot more messy
2023/7/18 14:17:58 - Too Much Noise Over Russia’s Influence In Africa – OpEd
2023/7/18 12:15:08 - Lagos now most expensive state in Nigeria
2023/7/18 11:43:40 - Nigeria Customs Intercepts Arms, Ammunition From US
2023/7/17 17:07:56 - Minister Eli Cohen: Nairobi visit has regional and strategic importance
2023/7/17 17:01:56 - Ruto Outlines Roadmap for Africa to Rival First World Countries
2023/7/17 16:47:30 - African heads of state arrive in Kenya for key meeting
2023/7/12 16:51:54 - Kenya, Iran sign five MoUs as Ruto rolls out red carpet for Raisi
2023/7/12 16:46:35 - Ambassador-at-Large for Global Women’s Issues Gupta Travels to Kenya and Rwanda
2023/7/2 15:57:52 - We Will Protect Water Catchments
2023/7/2 15:53:49 - Kenya records slight improvement in global peace ranking
2023/7/2 14:33:37 - South Sudan, South Africa forge joint efforts for peace in Sudan
2023/7/2 13:08:02 - Tinubu Ready To Assume Leadership Role In Africa
2023/7/2 11:50:34 - CDP ranks Nigeria, others low in zero-emission race
2023/6/19 16:30:00 - South Africa's Ramaphosa tells Putin Ukraine war must end
2023/6/17 16:30:20 - World Bank approves Sh45bn for Kenya Urban Programme
2023/6/17 16:25:47 - Sudan's military govt rejects Kenyan President Ruto as chief peace negotiatorThe Sudanese military government of Abdel Fattah al-Burhan has rejected Kenyan President William Ruto's leadership of the "Troika on Sudan."
2023/6/17 16:21:15 - Kenya Sells Record 2.2m Tonnes of Carbon Credits to Saudi Firms

The comments are owned by the author. We aren't responsible for their content.