However M23 plays the
negotiations, there seems little prospect of Kabila recovering his political
authority in the east or indeed, anywhere else in the country. This is his first
major crisis since the death of his political and business advisor Augustin
Katumba Mwanke (AC Vol 53 No 11, A government of few talents). No official has
been able to match Katumba’s ability to cajole, coopt and sometimes crush
Kabila’s political opponents. Instead, Kabila is under siege from politicians
within his camp and from oppositionists furious at Congo’s inability to defend
its own territory.
Congo-K
Some are nationalists genuinely angry about the state of the government and army
but others are provincial and Territorial Administration officials (running
customs and tax departments) exploiting the crisis to boost their local income
and power-base. This will further weaken Kinshasa’s grip on the state and
political developments.
Kabila is caught between the nationalists’ angry demands and groups with which
M23 has built alliances. These include militias such as the Forces de résistance
patriotiques en Ituri under ‘Cobra’ Matata Banaloki, and General Kakule Sikule
‘Lafontaine’ who ran a local ‘community defence’ militia, the Patriotes
résistants congolais (Pareco, AC Vol 51 No 2, Problems on the home front & Vol
53 No 9, Wanted – the Terminator). These militias could reinforce M23’s push
southwards and westwards, and back its attempts to establish local
administrations.
‘If not Kabila, then who?’
M23’s rapid progress towards Bukavu in this week was undoubtedly helped by other
opposition groups. What they all have in common, beyond distrust of the
government, is far less clear. This latest breakdown in government control will
probably provoke more instability and political in-fighting. When people in
Kinshasa ask, ‘If not Kabila, then who?’ a long pause usually follows. Partisans
of the Union pour la démocratie et le progrès social argue that their
presidential candidate, Etienne Tshisekedi wa Mulumba, was the real winner of
last November’s election and should take over.
Yet there’s no sign that Tshisekedi could win over the inchoate military and he
has so far failed to capitalise on his rival’s political woes. The last time he
tried to exploit a rebellion in the east, the consequences were fairly
disastrous for him. Even Kabila’s former ally Vital Kamerhe, who won strong
support from Western governments, has failed to make himself heard.
The disarray in Kinshasa is sending shock waves towards Kabila’s main business
partners, such as Israel’s Dan Gertler, Swiss-based Glencore and the Eurasian
National Resources Corporation who face growing international criticism of the
opacity of their commercial operations in Congo. We hear that Glencore’s
would-be merger partner, Xstrata, has privately raised concerns about the
reputational risk of its mining deals in Congo. Should Kabila fall, that
reputational risk would escalate into a massive financial risk.
There are obvious parallels between the current war and the rebellions of 1996
and 1998: the first led to the ousting of President Mobutu Sese Seko within a
year; the second led to a succession of political crises resulting in the
assassination of Mobutu’s successor, Laurent-Désiré Kabila. Now his son Joseph
is in the gunsights of eastern rebels. Although international pressure should be
sufficient to prevent Uganda and Rwanda from joining M23 in a military drive on
Kinshasa, Kabila lacks the domestic support to organise a credible fightback.
Riots in Bunia and Bukavu
On 19 November, 103 members of parliament and senators supported a declaration
that Kabila had not tried to build a national army during his eleven years in
office and that his tolerance of Rwanda and Uganda bordered on ‘high treason’.
On 20 and 21 November, nine people died in riots in Kisangani, Bukavu and Bunia,
as people vented their anger about Kabila’s failure to take on the invaders. All
these towns were recorded as voting for him in the 2011 election.
Kabila initially refused to negotiate directly with the rebels but changed tack
after prodding from the International Conference on the Great Lakes Region,
which held a summit in Kampala on 24 November. On paper, the ICGLR offers
independent mediation but the real powers behind it, Rwanda and Uganda, are also
backing M23. On 26 November, M23’s military leader, Brigadier Gen. Sultani
Makenga, flew to Kampala to meet Kabila and Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni.
The next day, Uganda’s Defence Minister, Gen. Aronda Nyakairima, announced that
M23 would pull out of Goma.
A central problem for Kabila is the nature of M23’s demands. If he negotiates
command positions in the national army with the rebels and the posting of key
units and commanders, there will be little chance of forging a credible national
army. The commander of ground forces, Gen. Gabriel Amisi Kumba (‘Tango-Four’),
was suspended two days after his troops lost Goma. The United Nations Panel of
Experts had accused him of procuring and selling ammunition and weapons to
illegal armed groups, including the notorious militia Raia Mutomboki and their
enemies the Nyatura, as well as to poachers (AC Vol 53 No 23, Expert opinions).
European diplomats have for some time pressured Kabila to take action against
Amisi, we hear. Amisi has been ‘running his own empire’ inside Congo-K, said one
source. He is a former commander with the Rassemblement congolais pour la
démocratie-Goma (RCD-Goma), the last group to take Goma. He has close ties to
the Kigali regime. Lieutenant Gen. François Olenga Tete has assumed Amisi’s
duties during his suspension and has immediately begun attempting to instil some
order among the unruly troops that have retreated to Minova in South Kivu (AC
Vol 44 No 24, Peace or bust). Reports emerged from Minova of army soldiers
looting, shooting and raping. Since Olenga arrived, at least two soldiers have
apparently been shot for indiscipline. He acknowledged that he had had
‘traitors’ shot and was trying to rally the troops.
Kabila has not grasped the severity of the crisis unfolding in the east. His
circle of advisors tends only to give him good news and there is, we understand,
a belief that removing M23 from Goma will solve all the government’s problems.
This could prove to be dangerously deluded.
Source: www.africa-confidential.com
Navigate through the articles | |
The Revolution in Crisis | On a Knife Edge - Close Election to Test Its Peace and Democracy |
|